10FOUR One-Day Pass Rules + Discount Code COMPARE
Understand 10FOUR One-Day Pass evaluation versus funded payout rules, five qualifying days, 30%/40% consistency and COMPARE 40% savings.
Yash R
· Updated

10FOUR One-Day Pass removes evaluation consistency and minimum-day requirements, but funded payouts require five qualifying days and a best-day consistency test. The first payout uses a 30% threshold; later cycles use 40%. Verified code: COMPARE provides 40% off eligible regular catalog fees.
Verified on 12 October 2026. Verified code: COMPARE.
Official sources checked: 7 October 2026. This guide explains the evaluation-to-funded change. Passing quickly does not mean a first payout becomes available after one profitable day.
One-Day Pass describes evaluation speed
The official evaluation article says there is no evaluation consistency requirement or minimum number of trading days. The target must be achieved on an end-of-day closing balance while the account stays within its other limits.
That creates the possibility of completing the evaluation on the first day. It is not a promised completion time and does not turn the simulated evaluation profit into a withdrawable reward. A trader can reach an intraday display target and still need the required closing result and compliance review.
| Requirement | Evaluation | Funded payout cycle |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum trading-day count | None | Five qualifying profitable days |
| Best-day consistency | None | 30% first cycle; 40% later cycles |
| Purpose of profit | Reach evaluation objective | Build eligible funded profit and meet payout conditions |
Keep evaluation and funded journals separate. A large evaluation winner should not be carried into the funded cycle's best-day field, and a fast pass should not create an expectation of fast payment.
Five qualifying days means five measured results
The payout-objectives guide lists five qualifying days in each current cycle. The minimum daily net result is $100 on $25K, $150 on $50K, $200 on $100K and $250 on $150K. The days need not be consecutive.
For a hypothetical $50K cycle, daily results of $200, $170, $145, -$80, $210, $190 and $160 contain five qualifying days. The $145 positive day falls short of the $150 requirement; the losing day does not erase the earlier count. Total cycle profit is $995.
This sample illustrates day counting only. It does not establish that the account has cleared its buffer or met a payout minimum. A journal with a tick beside every green day would count incorrectly, while a journal that resets all ticks after a loss would also misread the rule.
Consistency has a separate numerator and denominator
The consistency check compares the largest day's profit with total cycle profit. A quick planning calculation divides best-day profit by the applicable threshold. For a $900 best day, 30% corresponds to $3,000 total cycle profit; 40% corresponds to $2,250.
| Hypothetical best day | Cycle total | Best-day share | First-cycle 30% screen | Later-cycle 40% screen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $900 | $2,000 | 45% | Above limit | Above limit |
| $900 | $2,250 | 40% | Above limit | At limit |
| $900 | $3,000 | 30% | At limit | Within limit |
| $900 | $3,600 | 25% | Within limit | Within limit |
These are arithmetic screens, not payout approvals. The guide permits the best day to be at or below the stated percentage. Keep full precision and use the actual dashboard result rather than rounding a slightly excessive ratio down.
A later loss reduces total cycle profit while the earlier best day can stay unchanged. For example, $900 divided by $3,000 is 30%; after a $300 loss, $900 divided by $2,700 is about 33.33%. A previously acceptable first-cycle ratio can become unacceptable.
Do not confuse a missed ratio with a risk breach
The payout-objectives article says exceeding the best-day percentage delays the request rather than breaching the account or removing that profit. That distinction concerns consistency only. A separate loss-limit or conduct violation can have different consequences.
Do not respond to a missing percentage by forcing additional trades, increasing size or deliberately losing money. More trading can worsen both the denominator and the account's risk position. The journal should explain what is missing, rather than prescribe a daily earnings target.
Keep three independent eligibility fields: qualifying-day count, consistency and available amount above the retained buffer. A single passed checkbox cannot show which condition is currently blocking a request.
Approval resets the cycle, while the buffer remains
The cycle guide says the first cycle starts when the account is funded and a new one begins after each approved payout. Day count, cycle profit and best day reset. The consistency threshold changes from 30% to 40% after the first payout and stays there.
The buffer remains the withdrawal floor. On $50K, the listed buffer is $2,600 above starting balance, so $52,600 must remain. The $500 minimum request requires at least $53,100 before that minimum is available, assuming all other conditions are met. Merely touching $52,600 does not create $500 that can be withdrawn.
For a hypothetical $54,100 balance, $1,500 sits above that buffer. The $50K per-request cap is $2,000, but the smaller $1,500 above-buffer amount would constrain the request. The cap does not authorize withdrawing money that the buffer requires to stay.
Keep gross request and cash share distinct
The documented trader share is 90%. An illustrative approved $1,000 gross request corresponds to a $900 trader portion before any separate provider charges. Keep both fields in the ledger and reconcile the actual confirmation.
Requests are locked after submission according to the payout-objectives page, so review the amount before sending it. Its processing description is within 24 business hours, with first-payout verification potentially taking longer. That is a published service expectation, not independently tested payment performance.
Passing consistency and receiving money also do not guarantee selection for a live program. The firm describes consideration after qualifying payouts as discretionary. Treat funded status, payout approval and a live invitation as separate events.
Compare the exact purchase setup before COMPARE
The evaluation article allows a daily-loss-limit choice on $50K, $100K and $150K purchases, with a price credit for selecting the limit. The $25K setup has no such option. The selected choice carries into funded trading. This makes the exact configuration relevant to price and subsequent rules.
Current-source conflict checked 11 October 2026: the official catalog now lists DLL-On configurations at all four sizes, with daily limits of $600/$1,250/$2,000/$3,000. The evaluation guide still says $25K has no DLL and gives optional enabled limits of $1,250/$2,500/$3,750 on the larger sizes. Do not treat either table as resolving the other. Confirm the selected configuration and issued agreement with 10FOUR before purchasing or relying on a daily-loss amount.
A current numeric One-Day Pass checkout quote was not established from the accessible pricing page for this article, so no older fee is presented as today's price. Use the official pricing selector and PFA's current COMPARE terms. For an eligible regular base quote, the 40% calculation is quote multiplied by 0.60; the savings are quote multiplied by 0.40.
Do not apply that arithmetic to a separately discounted sale price or assume the optional credit stacks. Compare the actual line items, reset costs, taxes and any separate charges. No new checkout test or fixed coupon expiry is claimed.
Redemption and transition checklist
- Select One-Day Pass, size and the intended daily-loss-limit option.
- Read evaluation and funded rules separately before purchase.
- Enter COMPARE and verify the eligible 40% reduction.
- Save the total and issued terms.
- On funding, begin a new journal for days, consistency, buffer and gross requests.
The 10FOUR review and general coupon guide provide wider context. This guide does not substitute Daily EOD or Instant Prime rules. Affiliate disclosure: PFA may earn commission from qualifying referrals. Program balances are simulated, fees can be lost and no passing time or payout is guaranteed.
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Its evaluation has no minimum trading-day requirement, but funded payouts require five qualifying days plus consistency, buffer and other conditions. A one-day evaluation pass is not a one-day payout promise.
There is none during evaluation. The largest funded day must be at or below 30% of cycle profit for the first payout and 40% for later payouts.
The payout guide says qualifying days need not be consecutive and an intervening losing day does not reset their count. The loss still affects profit and other rules.
The cycle’s qualifying-day count, profit and largest day reset. The retained buffer and locked loss floor remain in place, and the later consistency threshold is 40%.
Use the current eligible regular quote for the exact setup and multiply by 0.60 for 40% off. This article does not quote an unverified current One-Day Pass fee or assume stacking with another offer.