Alpha Futures Target Hit but No Pass? + Promo Code COMPARE
Check Alpha Futures evaluation targets, best-day consistency and minimum days. Includes COMPARE up to 50% savings with conditional final prices.
Yash R
· Updated
Why can Alpha Futures show the target without a pass?
Reaching the profit target is only one evaluation condition. Standard also requires 50% best-day consistency and at least two trading days; Advanced requires 40% consistency and at least three days. A large winning session can make the total profit needed to satisfy consistency higher than the advertised target. Read the account's current pass status before treating the evaluation as complete.
2026 coupon summary: COMPARE offers up to 50% off eligible Alpha Futures purchase fees, according to the current Yash R-verified coupon record. The actual rate is account-specific. A coupon affects the eligible fee, not the pass conditions.
Verified on 12 October 2026. Verified code: COMPARE.
Official rules and prices checked: 8 October 2026. This guide focuses on evaluation readiness. For the later stage, use the separate Qualified payout checklist.
Which evaluation conditions should you check together?
The current Standard product page and Advanced product page publish these requirements. The official consistency explanation measures a single day's profit against total net profit.
| Evaluation | Nominal size | Published profit target | Best-day maximum | Minimum trading days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | $50,000 | $3,000 | 50% | 2 |
| Advanced | $50,000 | $4,000 | 40% | 3 |
The percentage shown here is for evaluation. Do not substitute a Qualified payout percentage or count payout winning days as evaluation days. A trade-count total is also different from a trading-day total.
How do you calculate the effective profit requirement?
For a positive net profit, calculate the larger of two numbers: the published target, or the best day's net profit divided by the evaluation consistency rate. Then compare that requirement with the dashboard's current net profit. This is planning arithmetic, not a promise that an account will pass automatically.
What if Standard reaches $3,000 with a $2,100 best day?
Consider this original Standard $50K evaluation example:
| Session | Net result | Running net profit | Best day | Best-day share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +$2,100 | $2,100 | $2,100 | 100% |
| 2 | +$900 | $3,000 | $2,100 | 70% |
| 3 | +$700 | $3,700 | $2,100 | About 56.76% |
| 4 | +$500 | $4,200 | $2,100 | 50% |
At the end of session 2, the advertised target and two-day minimum are reached, but consistency remains outside the stated limit. The unchanged $2,100 best day requires $4,200 total profit at 50%, leaving $1,200 beyond the $3,000 target. The final row satisfies the arithmetic shown; the dashboard and all other rules still control pass readiness.
What happens if the next winning day becomes the biggest?
The requirement must be recalculated. Starting from $3,000 total profit with a $2,100 best day, a new $2,500 session would produce $5,500 total profit and a new $2,500 numerator. Its share would be about 45.45%. Reusing $2,100 would give the wrong ratio even though both results happen to fall below 50% in this illustration.
Can a loss put a previously acceptable ratio outside the limit?
Yes, mathematically. At $4,200 total profit with a $2,100 best day, a later $300 net loss reduces the denominator to $3,900. The best-day share becomes about 53.85%. A smaller balance can therefore change the pass-readiness calculation while the best winning day stays unchanged.
This is why a screenshot of yesterday's target achievement is insufficient. Reconcile today's net result, corrections and posted charges with the dashboard. Do not add winning sessions while omitting losses. These examples use net results already, so subtracting the same commission again would double-count it.
How is an Advanced evaluation different?
For an Advanced $50K account, a $1,800 best day requires $4,500 total profit at the 40% threshold. Merely reaching the $4,000 advertised target leaves a 45% concentration. The three-day minimum remains a separate check, even if the mathematical profit requirement is met sooner.
The official evaluation wording allows the stated maximum percentage. Qualified-account wording has separate boundary language and cycle rules; this evaluation calculation should not be reused as a payout approval test. Advanced's absence of Qualified consistency also does not remove its 40% evaluation condition.
What is the purchase price with COMPARE?
The official product pages linked above currently list the following monthly evaluation bases. These are conditional initial-payment examples at the maximum 50%, not guaranteed order totals.
| Plan | Account size | Regular price (USD) | Coupon code | Discount | Savings (USD) | Final price after discount (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard evaluation, initial monthly payment | $50,000 | $129.00 | COMPARE | Up to 50%; 50% illustrated | $64.50 if full rate applies | $64.50 if full rate applies |
| Advanced evaluation, initial monthly payment | $50,000 | $209.00 | COMPARE | Up to 50%; 50% illustrated | $104.50 if full rate applies | $104.50 if full rate applies |
Choose the plan on Alpha Futures, enter COMPARE and check the accepted rate before payment. Renewals, resets, software, payment charges and taxes are not assumed discounted. For the existing conflict between official Qualified billing statements, consult the renewal guide and obtain the selected account's written terms.
What should you do when all visible conditions look complete?
Check that the account is the intended evaluation and that its day count, current net profit, best-day ratio and breach status are correct. Save the account ID, session dates and relevant dashboard values. If the displayed pass status still disagrees, ask official support to reconcile those specific fields. Do not keep trading simply to force a status update, and do not buy another evaluation before understanding the existing account's status.
Examples are hypothetical educational calculations, not trading instructions or guaranteed outcomes. Evaluation and Qualified balances are simulated. Fees can be lost and performance payments depend on the account terms. Some links may be affiliate links.
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
The official consistency article describes it as a condition that must be satisfied to pass. Other conduct and loss-limit rules continue to apply; a favorable consistency ratio cannot reverse a separate breach.
No. With an unchanged best day, divide that result by the evaluation percentage and compare it with the published target. The higher figure is the mathematical profit requirement, subject to all other conditions.
Use the evaluation rule for the purchased plan. Standard currently lists 50% and Advanced 40%; the Qualified stage has separate rules.
No. COMPARE concerns eligible purchase fees. Targets, loss limits and minimum days retain their account-specific values.
No. Those are minimum-day conditions on the stated plans. Results, consistency, loss rules and official account review determine whether qualification occurs.