Atlas Futures Consistency Ledger + Coupon Code COMPARE

Atlas Standard uses two best-day limits: 50% of total evaluation profit to pass, then 40% of each funded cycle’s profit. Reaching the dollar target or completing enough trading days does not independently satisfy that ratio. Calculate the largest day and the relevant total from the same period.

Verified on 12 October 2026.

Coupon summary: COMPARE is the publisher-verified offer for 50% off eligible Atlas Funded Futures base purchase fees, personally verified by Yash R on 12 October 2026. Official rules checked 11 October 2026. No fresh numeric base quote was established for this article; the conditional coupon calculation appears below.

Start with the correct program and stage

The Atlas Standard guide states the evaluation’s 50% test and funded 40% test. The trading-days guide separates day counts from consistency and says being above the ratio delays qualification rather than automatically breaching the account. Apex has no consistency test in that guide; Direct and Live have their own rules.

Label a private worksheet with Standard, account identifier, stage and period start. A column simply called “profit” is inadequate if it can mix evaluation results with funded results or combine two funded cycles. Keep a copy of the dashboard’s reported period and resolve ambiguous adjustments before calculating from a larger denominator.

For a positive total T and largest eligible daily profit B, the ratio is B ÷ T. With B unchanged, the total needed at a limit c is B ÷ c. This is arithmetic under the stated rule, not a recommended earnings target or an assurance of a pass.

An evaluation can reach its target too early for consistency

Use an illustrative Standard $50K evaluation. The current model guide lists a $3,000 target. Suppose three closed daily results are +$1,800, +$900 and +$300. The total reaches $3,000, but the best day represents 60% of it.

The account has reached one numerical requirement without satisfying another. An extra $600 of net profit would bring the illustrated ratio to 50% only if the largest day and other relevant inputs remain unchanged. Subsequent losses or a larger winning day change the calculation.

Do not convert the $600 difference into an instruction to increase risk. It is a measurement of the current record. Continuing to trade can worsen the result, and all loss and conduct rules remain active.

A funded cycle uses a different denominator and limit

Suppose a fresh funded cycle contains daily results of +$500, +$150, +$150, +$150 and +$150. Total profit is $1,100 and the largest day is $500. The ratio is about 45.45%, above 40%, even though each of the five illustrated days reaches Standard’s published $150 qualifying-day threshold.

With that best day unchanged, $500 ÷ 0.40 gives $1,250 as the arithmetic total needed. A further $150 net day would take the example to that total. The calculation demonstrates why the day counter and consistency counter need separate fields.

It still does not establish an approved reward. The Futures payout guide has other requirements, while our gross-request and retained-balance guide covers that separate monetary calculation. Keep eligibility, permitted request and eventual receipt distinct.

Recalculate after both winners and losses

A new best day changes the numerator. Starting from the funded example, imagine a later $900 day takes total profit from $1,100 to $2,000. The largest day becomes $900, so the ratio is 45%. More total profit has not necessarily brought the record within the limit.

A loss can move an otherwise acceptable ratio the other way. If B is $500 and T is $1,300, the ratio is about 38.46%. A subsequent $100 net loss reduces T to $1,200, lifting the ratio to about 41.67% without changing B.

These are hypothetical sequences, not recommended trading patterns. They explain why a worksheet must recalculate from the complete record. Do not lock a green “passed” label after the first favorable reading or omit losing rows to make the denominator larger.

Reconcile the period before relying on the ratio

Atlas’s day guide defines its futures day using the 4:45 PM New York boundary. Use the firm’s day grouping rather than merging or separating trades according to a local midnight. The session-close guide covers the timing issue in detail.

Store the final daily result, largest-day marker, cycle total and dashboard comparison. Where commissions, corrections or reviewed profits create a difference, identify the affected entries and ask how the account calculates them. Do not silently switch between gross ticket profit and a net dashboard figure.

Keep different account histories separate. A strong day on one Standard account does not enlarge another account’s denominator. When a cycle closes, archive the final record and start the next from the firm’s confirmed cycle definition.

Apply the purchase discount independently

A current base price could not be independently re-established for this check. For the exact selected Standard size at an eligible regular USD fee P, COMPARE saves P × 0.50 and leaves a conditional base fee of P × 0.50. No reset, bundle, upgrade or separate charge is assumed to receive that discount.

1. Open the official Futures selector and choose Standard and the intended size.
2. Review its evaluation and funded rules, rather than using another model’s consistency setting.
3. Record the current regular base quote and separate charges.
4. Enter COMPARE and verify the eligible 50% reduction before paying.
5. Save the receipt and issued agreement alongside the account’s period definitions.

Read the Futures coupon terms and full review. No new checkout test or guaranteed expiry is claimed. PFA may earn commission from qualifying referrals. Accounts are simulated, fees can be lost, and a correct spreadsheet calculation does not guarantee qualification or payment.