Skip to content
guides 5 min read

MyFundedPerps Allocation Limits + Promo Code AUDIT

Plan MyFundedPerps account allocation, model caps and Funding Review, with AUDIT 30% base-fee savings and practical examples.

YR

Yash R

· Updated

MyFundedPerps Allocation Limits + Promo Code AUDIT

Verified code: AUDIT.

MyFundedPerps permits up to $300,000 in active funded allocation, with a separate $100,000 ceiling for each of Select, Prime and Signature. Several smaller accounts add together. Passing another challenge does not bypass a model ceiling. AUDIT is PFA’s active 30% base-challenge discount.

Verified on 12 October 2026. Verified code: AUDIT.

Code: AUDIT

Checked against official sources: 5 October 2026. This guide answers how to plan multiple accounts and interpret Funding Review. It is separate from our first-payout buffer guide, which concerns money retained inside one account.

The purchase budget comes first

The official price matrix lists the following standard 80% split fees. The calculations use the PFA AUDIT offer, without combining another promotion.

PlanSizeRegular fee USDCodeDiscountSavings USDFinal base fee USD
Select$50,000$190.00AUDIT30%$57.00$133.00
Select$100,000$360.00AUDIT30%$108.00$252.00
Prime$100,000$595.00AUDIT30%$178.50$416.50
Signature$100,000$870.00AUDIT30%$261.00$609.00

Optional split upgrades, tax and separate charges are outside these base rows. Buying one $100K account in each model would cost a calculated $1,277.50 in base fees. That is a purchase-cost sum, not a recommendation or a guarantee that all three challenges will pass.

Two ceilings must be satisfied simultaneously

The current rules distinguish model allocation from total allocation. To screen a proposed funded account, add its original size to the active allocation in that model, then add it to the active total. Both results must fit.

Consider these independent examples:

Active funded allocationProposed newly funded accountResult of allocation screen
$75K Select, $50K Prime$25K SelectSelect reaches $100K; total $150K
$75K Select, $50K Prime$50K SelectSelect would reach $125K; exceeds model cap
$100K Select, $100K Prime$100K SignatureEach model fits; total reaches $300K
$100K Prime onlyAnother $100K PrimeExceeds Prime cap despite total below $300K

These examples screen allocation only. They do not establish identity approval, rule compliance or entitlement to a new account.

Why account profits do not create allocation space

The funding lifecycle documentation measures allocation using original account sizes. Profits, losses and withdrawals do not resize it. Failed, closed and archived accounts cease using active allocation.

For example, two $50K Select accounts occupy $100K in that model even if their current balances total $108K. A withdrawal lowering that combined balance to $104K does not create $4K or $8K of additional capacity. Conversely, losing money in an active account does not shrink its original allocation for this calculation.

Keep original size and current balance in separate spreadsheet columns. Mixing those fields is the most avoidable planning mistake: one describes program capacity, while the other tracks trading performance.

What Funding Review actually means

An account that would exceed a cap enters Funding Review after identity and agreement steps rather than receiving automatic funding. Review does not guarantee extra allocation. Completed identity and agreement steps stay attached to the application while it waits.

A practical tracker should record account ID, model, original size, stage, status and next dashboard action. Mark a passed evaluation separately from an issued funded account. Otherwise, a spreadsheet may count an account that has not yet been activated or overlook an existing active account consuming the same model allowance.

When a status looks inconsistent, gather the identifiers and current dashboard states before contacting official support. Avoid repurchasing a challenge merely because a review screen has not changed; a second fee does not resolve an allocation conflict.

Smaller accounts can cost more without expanding the ceiling

Two $50K Select purchases at $133 each cost $266. One $100K Select costs $252 after the same offer. The difference is $14. If both smaller evaluations eventually become funded, they still consume the same $100K model allowance.

This does not mean one large account is automatically preferable. Separate accounts create separate operational records and trading requirements. Compare the cost and administrative workload with the way the strategy is actually managed, rather than assuming extra account count creates extra permitted allocation.

A simple purchasing worksheet has three tests: affordable total fees if every attempt fails, available allocation if every attempt passes, and manageable account count if all become active. Passing one test does not answer the others.

Redemption steps

  1. Visit MyFundedPerps.
  2. Check existing funded allocation by model before choosing another challenge.
  3. Select the account and split configuration.
  4. Enter AUDIT before payment.
  5. Review the 30% base reduction, separate options and full total.
  6. Save the receipt and account agreement.

Read the MyFundedPerps review for plan targets and loss limits. Allocation approval does not remove those trading requirements.

Affiliate disclosure: PFA may earn a commission from qualifying purchases through affiliate links. Program balances are not cash deposits belonging to the trader. Evaluation fees can be lost, and rewards depend on the account agreement and compliance. This guide does not claim firsthand account or payout testing.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes. Original active funded sizes add together within the same model.