TradeDay Quick Pay vs Fast Pass: Rules, Drawdown and Payouts in 2026
TradeDay 2.0 gives futures traders two main evaluation routes: Quick Pay and Fast Pass. Both offer $50K, $100K and $150K account sizes, but they target different priorities.
Quick Pay requires more evaluation days and uses 30% consistency, then provides payout access from the first eligible funded day without a funded consistency rule or buffer. Fast Pass can be completed in fewer days, but the EOD funded path uses qualifying-day and 45% consistency requirements.
This comparison explains the differences so traders can choose based on risk and payout rules rather than account size alone.
TradeDay Quick Facts
| Feature | Current Details |
|---|---|
| Account sizes | $50K, $100K and $150K |
| Profit target | 6% |
| Drawdown choices | Intraday and end-of-day configurations |
| Maximum drawdown | $2,000, $3,000 or $4,500 |
| Quick Pay minimum days | Five evaluation days |
| Fast Pass minimum days | As few as three |
| Quick Pay evaluation consistency | 30% |
| Fast Pass evaluation consistency | 45% |
| Sim profit split | 50% to 80% Quick Pay; 80% EOD Fast Pass |
| Live profit split | 90% |
| Platforms | Tradovate, TradingView, NinjaTrader and other supported platforms |
| News trading | Generally allowed |
| Listed coupon | None |
Prop Firm Audit does not currently list an approved TradeDay coupon, so this article does not add or promote one.
Account Targets and Loss Limits
| Account | Profit Target | Maximum Drawdown |
|---|---|---|
| $50K | $3,000 | $2,000 |
| $100K | $6,000 | $3,000 |
| $150K | $9,000 | $4,500 |
The 6% profit target is measured against the displayed account size, while the actual usable risk is the much smaller maximum drawdown.
A trader choosing a $50K account therefore works with $2,000 of maximum-loss room. Risk should be calculated against that $2,000 threshold, not the $50,000 headline balance.
Quick Pay Evaluation Rules
Quick Pay is designed for traders who accept a longer evaluation in exchange for faster funded payout access.
Current core requirements include:
- Five minimum evaluation trading days
- A 30% evaluation consistency rule
- A 6% profit target
- Plan-specific intraday or EOD drawdown
- Size-based position limits
- No separate headline daily loss beyond the selected risk structure
Quick Pay Consistency Example
The largest winning day must be 30% or less of total evaluation profit.
If the best day is $900, the trader needs at least $3,000 in total profit for that day to equal 30%. A large day may not close the account, but it can increase the total profit needed before the evaluation is complete.
This is stricter than Fast Pass's 45% evaluation rule, so Quick Pay rewards steady profit distribution.
Quick Pay Funded Payout Rules
The funded Quick Pay account is built around early withdrawal access.
Current listed rules include:
- Payout requests from day one when eligible
- $250 minimum request
- No funded consistency rule
- No funded payout buffer
- A tiered simulated profit share
- 90% profit share after moving live
The simulated split depends on net profit:
- 50% trader share below $4,000 in net profit
- 80% trader share after the applicable profit level
- 90% trader share in Live
The absence of a funded consistency rule is a meaningful advantage for traders whose daily returns are uneven. The lower initial split is the trade-off for day-one access.
Fast Pass Evaluation Rules
Fast Pass prioritizes speed during the evaluation.
Current core requirements include:
- Completion in as few as three trading days
- A 45% evaluation consistency rule
- A 6% profit target
- Intraday or end-of-day risk configurations
- Size-based maximum drawdown
A 45% rule is easier to satisfy than Quick Pay's 30% evaluation requirement.
If the largest winning day is $900, total evaluation profit must reach at least $2,000 for that day to equal 45%.
EOD Fast Pass Funded Rules
The end-of-day Fast Pass funded route has a more structured payout cycle:
- Five qualifying days
- A 45% funded consistency test
- Size-based payout caps
- 80% simulated trader share
- 90% live trader share
This path delays the first request compared with Quick Pay. In return, it starts with the higher 80% simulated profit share.
Fast Pass is therefore not automatically better because it passes faster. The trader also needs to consider the funded consistency rule and waiting-day requirement.
Intraday vs End-of-Day Drawdown
Intraday trailing drawdown follows the highest real-time account equity, including unrealized profit. A profitable open position can raise the threshold before it closes. If the trade reverses, the loss floor does not move back down.
End-of-day drawdown updates from the highest qualifying closing balance. Unrealized intraday profit does not immediately raise the threshold.
The EOD structure generally gives a trade more room to fluctuate during the session. The intraday version can suit tightly managed scalpers, but it requires constant awareness of the real-time floor.
TradeDay's maximum drawdowns are $2,000 on $50K, $3,000 on $100K and $4,500 on $150K. The active dashboard threshold controls.
Quick Pay vs Fast Pass Consistency
| Stage | Quick Pay | Fast Pass |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation | 30% | 45% |
| Funded | None on eligible Quick Pay | 45% on EOD Fast Pass |
A lower percentage is more demanding. At 30%, a single large day requires more total profit than at 45%.
Quick Pay is stricter before passing but easier after funding. Fast Pass is easier and faster during evaluation but keeps a funded consistency requirement on its EOD path.
Profit Split Comparison
Quick Pay begins at a 50% trader share below the current net-profit threshold and can rise to 80%. Fast Pass EOD simulated payouts use an 80% trader share. Live accounts use 90%.
This creates a clear trade-off:
- Quick Pay prioritizes access to withdrawals.
- Fast Pass EOD prioritizes a larger simulated split.
- Live progression provides the highest current trader share.
Traders should compare the amount they could actually withdraw after the split and payout cap, not only the percentage shown in marketing.
News Trading and Trading Conditions
News trading is generally allowed. The trader remains responsible for slippage, rejected orders and volatility around CPI, NFP, FOMC and other high-impact releases.
Positions must be closed before the published maintenance or weekend cutoff unless the selected account agreement explicitly permits holding.
TradeDay restricts conduct that cannot be replicated in normal futures markets, including:
- Account sharing
- Coordinated opposite positions
- Delayed-data exploitation
- Platform-error exploitation
- Unrealistic simulated fills
- Exceeding contract limits
- Unapproved automated execution
Copy trading is available within eligible ownership and account limits. Every copied order remains the trader's responsibility.
Platforms and Markets
TradeDay supports Tradovate, TradingView, NinjaTrader and other approved futures platforms. Availability can depend on the selected data connection, region and account type.
Before choosing a platform, verify:
- Supported contracts
- Commission schedule
- Data fees
- Order types
- Mobile and browser access
- Trade-copying compatibility
- Maintenance hours
TradeDay supports approved futures products rather than forex or CFD trading.
Evaluation Billing and Cost
TradeDay evaluations use monthly billing until the trader passes or cancels. The real cost therefore depends on the number of billing cycles required.
A trader should estimate a realistic completion time and include possible resets, platform charges and data fees. Fast Pass can reduce evaluation time, but it should not be selected only to avoid another monthly payment if its funded rules do not fit the strategy.
Current funded accounts are listed without an activation fee.
Which TradeDay Account Is Better?
Choose Quick Pay if:
- Day-one funded payout access matters most
- The trader can satisfy 30% evaluation consistency
- No funded consistency rule is preferred
- A lower initial simulated profit split is acceptable
Choose Fast Pass if:
- Passing in as few as three days is important
- A 45% evaluation rule fits the strategy
- An 80% simulated share is preferred
- Five funded qualifying days and 45% consistency are acceptable
Quick Pay is more favorable after funding. Fast Pass is easier during evaluation and starts with the larger simulated split.
Advantages
- Intraday and EOD drawdown choices
- Clear 6% profit targets
- No separate funded activation fee
- Day-one payout access on eligible Quick Pay accounts
- No Quick Pay funded consistency rule
- Faster Fast Pass evaluation
- 80% EOD simulated and 90% live profit share
- Popular futures platforms
- News trading generally allowed
Limitations
- Quick Pay evaluation consistency is strict at 30%
- Quick Pay can begin at a 50% simulated share
- EOD Fast Pass retains 45% funded consistency
- Payout caps differ by size
- Monthly evaluation billing continues until pass or cancellation
- Funded rules differ from the evaluation route
- Intraday trailing drawdown can tighten with unrealized profit
Final Verdict
TradeDay Quick Pay and Fast Pass solve different problems.
Quick Pay is the stronger option for traders who want flexible funded payouts and no funded consistency rule, even though its evaluation is more demanding. Fast Pass is better for traders who want to pass quickly and start with an 80% simulated split, provided they can manage five qualifying days and 45% consistency after funding.
The best decision comes from comparing the complete journey—evaluation consistency, drawdown, funded waiting days, profit split and payout cap—not only the speed of passing.