YRM Prop changes its consistency requirement between account stages. The current recorded Starter evaluation uses 50% consistency, while the Prime simulated-funded stage uses 35% for payout cycles. Prop Firm Audit records code COMPARE for 50% off YRM Prop purchases, subject to live checkout confirmation.
Direct comparison
| Stage | Consistency percentage | What it controls |
|---|---|---|
| Starter evaluation | 50% | Passing the challenge |
| Prime funded cycle | 35% | Requesting a payout |
The formula is the same:
Consistency = largest profitable day ÷ total relevant profit × 100
The denominator changes with the stage. Starter uses the evaluation record. Prime uses the funded payout-cycle record under the current rules.
Starter example at 50%
Suppose a trader finishes the evaluation with $3,000 total profit and a $1,400 best day.
$1,400 ÷ $3,000 = 46.67%
That is below 50%.
If the best day were $1,800, the result would be 60%. The total would need to reach $3,600 for $1,800 to equal 50%.
| Largest day | Minimum total at 50% |
|---|---|
| $750 | $1,500 |
| $1,000 | $2,000 |
| $1,500 | $3,000 |
| $2,000 | $4,000 |
Prime example at 35%
The funded rule is stricter. A $700 best day requires at least $2,000 total cycle profit:
$700 ÷ $2,000 = 35%
| Largest day | Minimum cycle total at 35% |
|---|---|
| $350 | $1,000 |
| $525 | $1,500 |
| $700 | $2,000 |
| $875 | $2,500 |
Because 35% is lower than 50%, the same best day requires a larger total after funding.
Why the calculation resets
Evaluation performance should not be carried into the funded payout cycle. Start a new tracker when Prime is issued, and begin again after an approved payout when the current rules reset the cycle.
A useful sheet should include:
- Date
- Net daily result
- Running cycle profit
- Largest profitable day
- Current consistency percentage
- Minimum total required
- Qualifying-day status
Losing days reduce the total without reducing the recorded best profitable day. That can make the consistency percentage rise.
Other Prime conditions still matter
Consistency is only one part of a request. Current recorded guidance also describes qualifying-day requirements, a minimum request, identity verification and progressive caps. Passing the 35% calculation does not override those conditions.
Likewise, the Starter evaluation must remain inside its end-of-day maximum-loss threshold. A good consistency score does not protect an account from a drawdown breach.
How COMPARE applies
Prop Firm Audit records:
| Item | Offer |
|---|---|
| Code | COMPARE |
| Discount | 50% off |
| Firm | YRM Prop |
| Effect | Purchase price only |
Enter COMPARE in the checkout and verify that the 50% reduction appears on the selected current Starter account. The old Instant Prime purchase model is discontinued, so do not assume the code revives or applies to a retired product.
Stage-change checklist
- Track Starter at 50%.
- Pass all evaluation conditions.
- Start a new sheet when Prime is issued.
- Track the Prime payout cycle at 35%.
- Count qualifying days separately.
- Recheck the current withdrawal cap.
- Reset the cycle tracker after an approved payout.
- Preserve the dashboard rule set.
Review the official YRM Starter page and the YRM Prop audit before purchase.
Bottom line
YRM’s consistency rule becomes tighter after funding: 50% during Starter and 35% during Prime payout cycles. Treat them as separate datasets. Code COMPARE is recorded for 50% off, but it does not change either calculation.