Foraxis Core Floating-Loss Limits + Promo Code AUDIT

Verified code: AUDIT.

Verified on 12 October 2026. Verified code: AUDIT.

Foraxis promo code AUDIT is verified for a 30% base-fee discount. The historical $25K 2-Step Core fee reference is $165, which would give $115.50 after AUDIT, saving $49.50, if that base still applies; its current fee was not reconfirmed on 12 October. Its funded floating-loss limit is 2% ($500), while the current $100K version shows 1% ($1,000). Do not assume that scaling account size leaves the funded floating-loss percentage unchanged.

Live selector checked: 4 October 2026. This guide covers the Core configurations identified below. Edge is a separate group. Coupon prices are calculations using the verified code.

Core fees after AUDIT

Price review on 12 October 2026 reconfirmed the current published 1-Step references and Two-Step $100K $525 base. The Two-Step $25K $165 reference could not be reconfirmed and its $115.50 coupon calculation is historical and conditional, not a current payable quote.

The official rule selector displays the regular one-time fee alongside each selected size and program. These base-fee calculations exclude taxes, payment conversion and separately selected options, and do not stack a second promotion.

The PFA Foraxis coupon page supplies AUDIT at 30% and no confirmed fixed expiry date. A lower entry fee does not increase the floating, daily or overall loss allowance.

Three loss tests answer different questions

Foraxis's rulebook treats floating loss as unrealized loss across open positions, checked while trades remain open. Daily loss also includes open positions, while Core's overall maximum drawdown is a fixed floor below starting balance. A recovery before closing does not erase an earlier floating-limit breach. Official limit definitions.

Think of the tests as separate dashboard checks:

• Floating loss: how much the current open book is losing.
• Daily loss: how far the account has fallen against the current daily reference.
• Overall loss: how far equity is from the account's permanent Core floor.

The tightest relevant limit can stop a strategy long before another one is close. A $10,000 overall allowance is therefore not permission to let one group of open trades lose $10,000.

The current $25K versus $100K 2-Step example

The selector showed the following phase-specific values when checked:

This is a comparison of two observed configurations, not an invented formula for every size. For another balance, select that size and funded phase explicitly. The current 1-Step Core $100K card likewise shows 2% ($2,000) in evaluation and 1% ($1,000) funded. Official selector.

Why four times the account size gives only twice this room

Moving from $25K to $100K multiplies nominal balance by four. The two observed funded floating-loss allowances increase from $500 to $1,000, only twice as much. A strategy cannot safely multiply every position by four merely because the account label is four times larger.

Suppose a hypothetical $25K funded strategy carries two open losses of $150 each. Its total is $300, leaving $200 below the $500 threshold. Multiplying each position's exposure by four would make the same proportional market move produce roughly $1,200 total open loss on $100K. That exceeds the observed $1,000 funded threshold.

Multiplying by two instead produces $600, with $400 remaining under that specific threshold. This is illustrative scaling arithmetic, not a recommendation to double positions or a guarantee against slippage, costs or other limits.

Aggregate positions before judging the floating limit

Consider an otherwise flat $100K funded 2-Step account with three hypothetical losing positions:

None of the individual trades loses $1,000, but the combined loss is already $950. Another $80 of adverse movement would take the total to $1,030. Looking at individual stops in isolation misses the aggregate problem.

This example uses only losing positions so that it does not assume how the firm offsets profitable positions against losing ones. Confirm the dashboard's aggregation convention before relying on a hedge or profitable trade to offset loss. The rulebook separately restricts hedging and several coordinated practices.

Closing a trade does not erase realized damage

If Trade A closes at a $420 loss, the remaining floating loss becomes $530 in this simplified example. The $420 has moved into realized account loss. It still affects equity and daily or overall headroom. Rotating losses from open to closed trades is not a way to replenish the account's total loss budget.

The useful journal therefore tracks both current open loss and realized losses since the daily reference. A sheet that records only today's closed trades will miss an active floating breach; a sheet that records only open positions will miss losses already realized.

A soft-breach label is not enough to establish the consequence

The funded cards label the floating threshold as a soft breach. However, the same rulebook's account-lifecycle section says an account exceeding floating, daily or maximum loss is closed. That is a material ambiguity.

Obtain the current consequence for the exact account in writing: position liquidation, temporary restriction, profit removal, warning accumulation or account closure should not be guessed from a label. Until clarified, plan to stay below the threshold rather than assuming a free warning. Official lifecycle section.

Prepare the funded transition before trading it

For a $100K 2-Step Core account, a loss pattern acceptable under the evaluation's $2,000 floating ceiling may be unacceptable under the funded $1,000 ceiling. Build a funded-stage version of the risk sheet before placing the first funded trade.

Record the group, model, size, phase, dollar floating limit, daily reference and overall floor. Then stress test the whole proposed open book against a shared adverse move. Include execution uncertainty rather than setting every planned exit exactly at the platform boundary.

These operating checks do not replace other requirements. The selector also specifies qualifying days, minimum trade duration and funded news restrictions. Edge accounts have their own rules and may use different drawdown or consistency mechanics; the Core figures here must not be copied into an Edge plan.

How to redeem AUDIT

1. Open Foraxis and choose Core or Edge deliberately.
2. Select the program and size, then read both evaluation and funded rules.
3. Confirm residence eligibility and the exact floating-loss consequences.
4. Enter AUDIT before payment.
5. Check the 30% reduction against the matching regular base fee.
6. Review the total and save the purchased agreement and receipt.

Read our Foraxis review for the broader current Core/Edge comparison and the general coupon guide for purchase context. Prefer the current model-and-size selector for rule values.

Affiliate disclosure: PFA may earn a commission from qualifying affiliate purchases. Foraxis accounts are simulated, nominal balances are not withdrawable deposits, and rewards are conditional. This article does not claim firsthand trading, payout verification or protection against losing the purchase fee.