Sure Leverage Funding Payout Fees + Promo Code AUDIT

Sure Leverage Funding's general rules list a payout transaction fee of 2% with a $10 minimum. The minimum can make a small payment's effective charge much higher than 2%. Before forecasting a net receipt, confirm which amount the provider uses as the percentage-fee base and how that charge interacts with the trader's profit share.

Verified code: AUDIT, 42% off eligible purchase fees plus a separately listed 10% extra payout-split benefit. Verified on 12 October 2026. The extra split is not another purchase discount and requires confirmation for the chosen account.

Find the point where the minimum stops dominating

The official general-rules page states the 2% charge and $10 minimum. For a fee-assessed amount called B, the simple model is the larger of $10 and 0.02 × B. The two are equal at $500, because $500 × 0.02 = $10.

Below $500, the minimum is the larger amount. Above $500, the percentage exceeds it. This is a fee-function calculation; it does not establish whether B means approved gross profit, the trader's share or a particular field in the request form. The short public statement does not settle that ordering question.

The rows are illustrative amounts, not a statement that each amount is eligible for withdrawal from every plan. Minimum requests, retained buffers, caps, consistency and account status remain separate checks.

Four amounts should stay on separate lines

A useful payout worksheet distinguishes approved profit, the account's trader share, the transaction-fee base and the amount ultimately delivered. Combining them into one field called payout makes it difficult to locate a discrepancy.

For example, $1,000 of approved profit at a hypothetical confirmed 90% share gives a $900 trader portion before transaction charges. A $20 fee and an $18 fee lead to different net receipts even though the headline percentage and profit are unchanged. The difference depends on whether the fee base was $1,000 or $900.

Neither row is asserted as the firm's universal ordering. Obtain the selected account's explanation or inspect an approved statement before treating one as a forecast. If the platform deducts charges before applying the share, record that method explicitly rather than forcing it into a different formula.

Small requests magnify the ordering question

Assume a hypothetical $100 approved-profit amount and a confirmed 90% share. That gives $90 before charges. If the $10 minimum is then deducted from the trader's portion, the modeled receipt is $80. If the fee is deducted from gross first and the share is applied afterward, the calculation is ($100 − $10) × 90% = $81.

The one-dollar difference is not the main lesson. The important point is that a clean calculation needs a defined order of operations. Rounding, provider charges and currency conversion can introduce further differences. Do not present a net amount to the cent as guaranteed while the inputs remain uncertain.

For an actual reconciliation, copy the confirmation's labels exactly into the worksheet. Add columns for the approved amount, split, stated fee, currency and delivered amount. If a number is unexplained, keep it marked unresolved and ask support about that exact field.

Request frequency also changes minimum-fee arithmetic

Under the simple model where each fee base is $200, five separate requests produce five $10 charges, or $50 total. One $1,000 fee base produces a $20 charge. The mathematical difference is $30.

This does not recommend delaying a payout or promising that the requests can be combined. Holding more profit inside an account can expose it to later losses, rule changes or counterparty risk, and each program has its own schedule and eligibility conditions. Fee efficiency is only one part of that decision.

A useful comparison asks what is actually available now, what remains exposed if no request is made, and whether the current account permits the alternative. Do not trade extra merely to cross the $500 fee breakpoint. Future profits are uncertain, while a proposed saving calculated from them is only hypothetical.

Use the chosen program's share and timing

The current 1-Step rules list a standard 90% trader share and a two-week request schedule, with additional eligibility conditions. Other models have their own terms. Use the share actually issued to the account rather than automatically applying 90% across the entire brand.

The same 1-Step source describes a conditional extra-share remedy for qualifying processing delays, with exclusions. That is a different provision from the AUDIT promotional extra-split listing. Neither establishes that all benefits combine or that a share can exceed 100%.

Before relying on the coupon's extra benefit, ask for the resulting share, the accounts it covers, its duration and any interaction with paid upgrades or other promotions. A successful 42% purchase reduction alone does not confirm those later reward terms.

Keep the entry coupon on a separate worksheet

The PFA coupon page lists AUDIT at 42% for eligible base fees. The purchase calculation is accepted regular base × 0.58. Public selectors did not expose a readable numeric quote in this article's text fetch, so obtain the selected configuration's current price directly from the official site.

These are formula examples, not newly verified plan-price quotes. The current coupon terms treat BNPL as a no-discount path and Futures Style eligibility as conditional. Do not apply these rows to either payment of a BNPL purchase or assume every separate product accepts AUDIT.

Choose the complete program, size and platform, review its terms, apply AUDIT, and check the fee reduction and documented split benefit separately before paying. Retain the total and issued agreement. The Sure Leverage Funding review and forex prop-firm category provide broader comparison context.

Disclosure: PFA may earn commission from qualifying referrals. This is document-based educational arithmetic, not firsthand payment testing or personalized financial advice. Simulated balances are not owned cash, fees can be lost, and approval or payment is not guaranteed. No fixed AUDIT expiry or universal net-payout quote is claimed.