Traders Launch Scalping and HFT + Coupon Code COMPARE

Verified code: COMPARE.

COMPARE is a verified Traders Launch code for 30% off eligible futures purchases. Before selecting an evaluation, check whether the strategy is permitted: the firm allows scalping described as 5–30-second trades, prohibits HFT-style activity and may pause an account for review when more than 10% of trades open and fully close within two seconds. This is a trade-count test, not a percentage-of-profit test.

Verified on 12 October 2026. Verified code: COMPARE.

Official sources checked 4 October 2026. This guide focuses on evaluating a trading method and keeping useful execution records. The separate 60-day and weekly-activity guide covers the evaluation calendar. Read the Traders Launch review and COMPARE coupon terms before buying.

Distinguish the conduct rules

The futures rules and Terms of Service identify several separate issues:

Remaining within a drawdown limit does not establish that a strategy satisfies these other conditions.

Calculate the short-trade share correctly

Use the number of relevant completed trades as the denominator. Do not substitute winning trades, total contracts or total profit unless the firm gives a different written account-specific definition.

Observed short-trade share = qualifying short-duration trade count ÷ total completed trade count × 100.

The published wording uses “more than 10%.” Exact equality is different arithmetically, but this should not be treated as permission to engineer a strategy at the boundary: HFT-style conduct is separately prohibited, and review uses the firm's records and judgment.

Do not add unnecessary trades to dilute a ratio. If the strategy relies on exceptionally short fills, stop and obtain clarification before paying for another account. A historical log review should identify a mismatch, not provide a method for concealing it.

Partial fills and timestamps deserve attention

An order, a fill and a completed position are not always the same counting unit. A position can enter in several executions and exit in pieces. The public rule does not explain every partial-fill grouping convention.

Preserve order IDs, execution IDs, quantity, entry and exit timestamps, instrument, account and net result. If the platform reports milliseconds but an export rounds to whole seconds, retain the more precise source. Ask support how it groups partial exits if that changes the assessment materially. Avoid presenting your own spreadsheet as proof that the firm must use the same denominator.

An example of ambiguous grouping

Suppose one three-contract entry is closed using three separate one-contract exits. A trader's personal journal may call that one idea; an execution export may contain several rows. Counting rows without inspecting their meaning can distort the short-trade percentage. The useful response is to reconcile the trade construction, not to assume the most favorable interpretation.

Hedging is assessed beyond one chart

A long position on one screen can coexist with an opposing position on another account. Similarly, using a different but correlated symbol does not automatically avoid a hedging rule. The firm's terms explicitly cover coordinated accounts belonging to different traders.

Build an exposure view that groups account, symbol, direction and overlapping time. If two strategies are run at once, review how they interact. A strategy-by-strategy report can miss a prohibited offset that exists only when both operate together.

This is particularly relevant before scaling a setup to several accounts. More accounts create more combinations to inspect; a lower purchase fee does not reduce that monitoring burden.

Scaling is not unlimited loss recovery

A planned scale-in has a defined maximum size, invalidation point and combined risk. An unbounded sequence of additions after losses has a different risk profile. For an internal review, compare the position's initial planned maximum with the largest actual exposure and document why each addition occurred.

That worksheet is an editorial control, not a numerical safe harbor issued by Traders Launch. The rules do not publish a universal number of additions that guarantees acceptance.

Standard futures entry fees after COMPARE

These are the 80% reward-share Standard configurations shown on the official pricing cards. Different reward-share selections and Legacy NYC accounts are separate products.

The calculations use the discount on the regular base fee once, without stacking another offer. Optional settings, taxes and separate charges are excluded. No fixed coupon end date is confirmed, and these prices are not tested checkout receipts.

Redeem the code after the strategy review

1. Review the current futures conduct rules against a representative trade log.
2. Resolve meaningful ambiguities with the firm before selecting an account.
3. Open Traders Launch and choose the size and reward-share option.
4. Enter COMPARE in the coupon field before payment.
5. Confirm the eligible 30% reduction and final order total.
6. Save the receipt, issued rules and any written clarification.

Both evaluation and funded-stage trading are described as simulated in the firm's terms. A permitted method still must meet the account's profit, risk and payout requirements; no coupon or checklist guarantees approval or a reward.

Disclosure: Some links may be affiliate links, which can support Prop Firm Audit if a reader makes a qualifying purchase. Trading-program fees can be lost, simulated results have limitations, and rewards are conditional rather than guaranteed.