Alpha Capital: Alpha Pro Payout Schedule Guide + Discount Code COMPARE50
Alpha Pro on-demand versus biweekly: current fees, eligibility examples, partial-withdrawal consistency and separate COMPARE50 and COMPARE offers.
Yash R
· Updated

Verified code: COMPARE50. Verified code: COMPARE.
Verified on 12 October 2026. Verified codes: COMPARE50 for qualifying first purchases; COMPARE for qualifying later purchases.
Alpha Pro's cheaper on-demand package can require more profit before a request than its biweekly alternative. PFA verifies COMPARE50 for 50% off a first purchase, with COMPARE for 30% off later purchases. For Alpha Pro 6% $100K, the current regular fees are $397 on-demand and $427 biweekly, giving first-purchase calculations of $198.50 and $213.50 respectively.
Verified against official prices and rules on 4 October 2026. The codes and distinct scopes come from the active Alpha Capital coupon record. There is no confirmed fixed expiry. Prop Firm Audit may earn a commission through affiliate links. The calculations exclude optional share/swap upgrades and do not combine promotions.
Compare the schedule before comparing the fee
On-demand Pro requires at least 2% gross profit and a best-day share of 40% or less. Biweekly Pro uses 14-day intervals from the first Qualified trade, a $100 gross minimum and five valid trading days for the first request. The two methods are not interchangeable: each official guide says the other route is unavailable on accounts choosing that method. Sources: on-demand conditions, biweekly conditions.
The trade-off therefore includes fee, profit threshold, profit distribution, qualifying activity and calendar timing. On-demand is useful when a compliant strategy naturally meets its conditions early. It is not a promise that any small profit can be withdrawn immediately.
Current $100K Pro 6% fee comparison
The official selector was checked at 2 Step → Alpha Pro 6% → $100K with DX Trade, standard 80% share and standard swaps. The on-demand total displayed $397; selecting biweekly displayed $427. No personal details were submitted and no coupon was applied for this check.
| Plan and schedule | Size | Regular fee USD | Code | Scope | Savings USD | Calculated final USD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pro 6% on-demand | $100,000 | $397.00 | COMPARE50 | 50% first purchase | $198.50 | $198.50 |
| Pro 6% biweekly | $100,000 | $427.00 | COMPARE50 | 50% first purchase | $213.50 | $213.50 |
| Pro 6% on-demand | $100,000 | $397.00 | COMPARE | 30% later purchase | $119.10 | $277.90 |
| Pro 6% biweekly | $100,000 | $427.00 | COMPARE | 30% later purchase | $128.10 | $298.90 |
At the listed first-purchase rate, biweekly costs $15 more. At the later-purchase rate, the difference is $21. Those differences are small relative to the hypothetical payout amounts below, but that does not make either package inherently better. Fees can be lost, and eligibility matters more than the simulated balance label.
An on-demand readiness calculator
For a fresh Pro payout window, record starting size, current eligible profit and best-day net profit. The on-demand thresholds can be expressed as two separate checks:
- Gross profit must meet 2% of the relevant account balance.
- Best-day net profit divided by total window net profit must be no more than 0.40.
For a simple fresh-account illustration in which the figures are consistently measured and no adjustments apply, the larger of the 2% minimum and best day × 2.5 indicates the controlling hurdle. Keep the firm's gross and net definitions separate when reconciling a real dashboard, particularly after fees, partial requests or removed profits.
| Fresh $100K illustration | Total eligible profit | Best day | Best-day ratio | On-demand checks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modest distributed gains | $800 | $200 | 25% | Below the $2,000 profit threshold |
| Concentrated gains | $2,400 | $1,200 | 50% | Profit threshold met; consistency not met |
| Distributed gains | $2,400 | $800 | 33.33% | Both numerical tests met |
| Exactly at consistency boundary | $3,000 | $1,200 | 40% | Numerical consistency condition met |
These examples assume the displayed profits are eligible. The official on-demand article expressly accepts 40% or less in its detailed explanation. A request still faces account review; numerical eligibility does not guarantee approval or a processing time.
Compare those cases with biweekly
Suppose the $800 example belongs instead to a biweekly account with five valid strategy-consistent trading days and an open scheduled request date. Its profit exceeds the published $100 gross minimum. At the standard 80% share, $800 eligible gross profit would imply $640 before any deductions. That is a meaningful difference from being below the on-demand 2% threshold, even though the on-demand account was $15 cheaper at first purchase.
Conversely, a trader satisfying the $2,400 distributed case early may value on-demand access rather than waiting for a calendar date. This comparison is a decision tool based on hypothetical paths, not a return forecast or a recommendation to trade to meet a deadline.
Partial withdrawals require a new-window ledger
The on-demand article says a partial withdrawal resets consistency, but placing a new trade starts a new payout window. Retained profit from the previous window does not count as newly generated profit for that window's consistency test.
Consider an original example with $400 retained from an earlier payout. After new trading, the account shows $3,000 above its starting balance, and the best new day is $1,100. Only $2,600 was generated in the new window. The relevant ratio is $1,100 ÷ $2,600 = 42.31%, rather than $1,100 ÷ $3,000 = 36.67%.
To bring that best day to 40%, the new window needs $2,750. Adding the retained $400 means $3,150 total above the start. This calculation assumes no other adjustment and no larger subsequent best day. A ledger separating prior retained funds from current-window net profit is safer than a single running account-profit number.
Five valid days are not five token trades
The biweekly guide requires the same trading strategy for its first five-day period and rejects minimal-lot trades used simply to make days count. It also explains that overnight positions and overlapping open/close dates do not automatically create extra days.
For preparation, list the dashboard-counted days beside the actual strategy activity. Do not fill a missing day with an artificial micro trade or assume that every calendar day containing an open position qualifies. If the count differs, resolve it before relying on a planned request date.
The evaluation and risk rules still apply
The Pro 6% document sets two 6% targets, three minimum days per phase, 6% static maximum loss and 3% daily loss based on the higher end-of-day balance/equity. Qualified accounts also have restrictions including weekend holding and affected-news execution. The payout schedule changes neither the need to qualify nor those account controls.
On-demand and biweekly fees buy access to a simulated program. They are not deposits and the $100K headline is not cash owned by the trader. Use the Alpha One versus Pro comparison for broader drawdown differences rather than importing One's trailing mechanics into this Pro calculation.
How to apply the correct Alpha Capital code
- Open the official Alpha Capital selector and choose Pro, percentage variant, size and platform.
- Choose the payout schedule after considering the thresholds and your own normal profit distribution.
- Keep the standard share and swap setting unless you deliberately want a paid add-on.
- Use COMPARE50 for the listed first-purchase offer or COMPARE for the listed later-purchase offer, without combining them.
- Check the account-specific fee reduction, eligibility and separate charges before payment.
- Save the selected schedule and agreement. Ask support about any mismatch before buying.
The Alpha Capital review and full coupon guide give additional context. A discount is useful only after the account's rules fit the intended trading approach.
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Verified code COMPARE50 provides 50% off the first purchase and COMPARE for 30% off later purchases. They are separate offers, not stackable calculations.
No. Pro on-demand has a 2% profit minimum and 40% best-day test; a smaller profit may qualify only under the biweekly package once its date and day conditions are met.
The official selector displayed $397 on-demand and $427 biweekly for the standard configuration checked. First-purchase coupon calculations are $198.50 and $213.50.
After a partial withdrawal and a new trade, the official guidance measures newly generated window profit separately. Old retained profit cannot simply be added to that denominator.
The official help pages say the alternative method is unavailable on accounts that chose the other route. Do not treat the purchase choice as a freely interchangeable payout button.